A new book from Edward Elgar Publishing in association with GIMMS.
The Gower Initiative for Modern Money Studies is pleased to announce that its book “Modern Monetary Theory: Key Insights, Leading Thinkers” has been published as a hardback edition and as an ebook by Edward Elgar Publishing.
The hardback, ISBN: 978 1 80220 808 5, has a recommended price of £115.
The ebook, ISBN: 978 1 80220 809 2 has a recommended price of £25, but at the time of writing, is available from Google Play at £18.
The twelve-chapter book analyses key economic issues from a wide set of regions including the UK, Europe and the Global South, addressing previous concerns that MMT is too US-focused.
Providing an up-to-date account of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) with contributions from the world’s leading experts, each chapter offers new insights on the topic, building upon MMT’s established body of work. This innovative book analyses key economic issues from a wide set of regions including the UK, Europe and the Global South, addressing previous concerns that MMT is too US-focused.
Alongside ground-breaking research written by MMT’s original developers and leading academics, the book also includes contributions from economic historians and public policy campaigners, highlighting how MMT contributes to challenging neoliberalism and the hegemony of mainstream macroeconomics. Offering an examination of the existing legal, institutional and policy framework which governs the UK Exchequer in particular, it examines how the central claims of MMT map onto the financial activities of the UK government.
This will be key reading for undergraduate and postgraduate economics students, as well as more advanced scholars of the discipline, particularly for those looking into theories of finance, money and banking. It will also have a wider appeal across the social sciences, including politics and sociology students.
We wanted this book to answer the criticisms we most often hear when discussing MMT with members of the public generally and also with those who have a background in economics. Arguments such as MMT only being relevant to the US, the idea that MMT-inspired policies would be inflationary or that the UK risked suffering the same problems as Greece if the government had not implemented austerity policies after the Global Financial Crisis. We feel that it is important to answer such critiques because the views held by mainstream economists and repeated by politicians and journalists leave our society stuck where we are, with poverty commonplace, housing for many being expensive and of poor quality, public services being privatized and hollowed out and jobs being poorly paid and becoming less secure. Such views also keep the Global South trapped in a cycle of poverty, resource extraction and foreign currency debt. The subjects of the individual chapters were selected with these points in mind; however, all the chapters are the views of the authors, and each author has their own perspective within a broad MMT framework.
In chapter 1, “How does the government spend? A functional model of the UK Exchequer” Andrew Berkeley, Richard Tye and Neil Wilson show the means by which the UK government spends. This is an extremely important piece of work and is groundbreaking in its depth and scope. The authors draw on historical sources, testimonies from government departments, official documentation and parliamentary abstracts, forensically disassembling the components of the UK government’s finances, debunking ideology and half-truths along the way. This is a Wizard of Oz moment, the pulling back of the curtain to reveal the myths and obfuscation that has enabled decades of needless austerity to wreck the lives of millions in the UK and around the world.
Chapter 2, “Credit and the Exchequer since the Restoration” by Richard Tye explores the history of ‘money’ both English, then British, to show what insights this history gives on our financial system as it is today. He then argues that today’s exchequer is in need of reform and that many of its departments should be eliminated as they are unnecessary, given that they are composed of layer upon layer of conventions that have conspired to create a complex web preventing the type of transparency necessary in a functioning democracy.
In Chapter 3, “Sovereign nations face resource constraints, not financial constraints” Yeva Nersisyan and L. Randall Wray show how MMT builds on the Chartalist approach to money and how the constraints on spending in government are often self-imposed, and that the insights of MMT apply to many countries, not just those who issue reserve currencies. They explore the relevance of MMT to developing countries and discuss why the popular belief that it does not apply in these nations is detrimental to those countries.
Chapter 4, “A framework for the analysis of the price level and inflation” is by Warren Mosler, one of the founders of MMT. He delivers one of MMT’s key insights “a unique understanding of inflation” in direct contrast to the frequent accusations that MMT economists ignore inflation. Mosler shows how a currency-issuing government creates a demand for its currency by imposing a tax liability and that the price level is dictated by the prices paid by government when it spends, not by the total amount of money that the government spends.
In chapter 5, “The external economy” MMT’s principal developer, William Mitchell, explains how the ending of the Bretton Woods system changed the constraints on government spending from financial to real resource ones instead. Mitchell also explains the key MMT insight ignored by other schools of economic thought, that at a macroeconomic level, exports are a real cost to a nation, and imports in real terms are a benefit. The erroneous belief that our exports are a benefit to the nation has enabled generations of political lobbying by exporters to put downward pressure on domestic wages and living standards. This, again, is in contrast to the orthodox narrative which sees exports as a policy target because they provide income to nations, rather than a balanced economy that focuses on strategic self-sufficiency.
In chapter 6, “Modern Monetary Theory, the United Kingdom and pound sterling“John T Harvey addresses the argument that MMT-inspired policies will cause the currency to collapse. He shows how the MMT-as-currency-killer argument is based on models and assumptions that are at odds with reality as well as misrepresenting MMT. Harvey presents a realistic model that shows that MMT-informed policies would not cause a currency collapse, nor would high inflation or stagflation be the result.
Chapter 7, “The Eurozone and Brexit” by William Mitchell and Stuart Medina Miltimore, examines the European Union and the Euro currency. They argue that the diversity of the nations in the Eurozone and the lack of a fiscal union make it unlikely that the Euro will be successful in the long-term, and that nations will more than likely exit the union.
In chapter 8, “Modern Monetary Theory as post-neoliberal economics: the role of methodology-philosophy” Phil Armstrong and Jamie Morgan show how methodology and philosophy support MMT within broader heterodoxy and argue that MMT is a variant of open systems theory. They show that MMT economists understand that institutions that are made by humans can be directed by humans for better or for worse, and that in the light of the climate crisis, care is needed to direct these institutions wisely.
Chapter 9, “Tax as a hygiene factor: setting UK taxation policy using Modern Monetary Theory” by Neil Wilson, explains the vital importance of taxation and that, contrary to the belief of many economists, MMT does not ignore it. He then presents his view on what is needed in an effective tax system and his own proposals for a new system for the UK that makes use of existing state structures to simplify taxation whilst driving the currency and releasing the resources needed by the public sector.
In chapter 10, “Checklist of an employment guarantee programme: the Plan Jefes de Hogar from Argentina revisited 20 years later” Daniel Kostzer examines the Jefes Plan, an employment guarantee initiative which ran in Argentina until 2009 and had begun as a response to the financial crisis of 2001 there. Kostzer describes the programme and explores what the experience of Argentina can teach us about the options for a Public Employment Programme, including the Job Guarantee.
Chapter 11, “Three lessons from government spending and the postpandemic recovery” by Pavlina R. Tcherneva, explores the lessons that can be learned from the response of governments to the Covid-19 pandemic. She shows how the response corroborated key MMT insights about money, employment and inflation and argues that these lessons should be heeded in the future to improve public health, reach and maintain full employment, control inflation and protect the environment.
Chapter 12, “MMT and public policy in the United Kingdom” sees Deborah Harrington and Jessica Ormerod use the MMT lens to examine the crucial role of the State in provisioning itself with the real resources necessary to meet its public purposes mandate. They examine the history of government investment in infrastructure and public services, their subsequent neglect, and the privatisation models which have in recent years failed to meet the needs of the population and have left millions lacking in decent housing, healthcare, and the skills necessary both for now and to pass on to future generations.
The book concludes with a postscript by L. Randall Wray, in which he gives his “thoughts on MMT’s insights”.
We, the editors, believe that an understanding of the insights of MMT is a vital base for the creation of a world where people have the opportunity to live lives free from poverty and hunger and also to have the ability to contribute to their communities. MMT is the starting point for improvements to our lives, the seed from where good policy can grow and flourish. Once the knowledge of the realities of our monetary system shows the true extent of policy options, it will be up to the people to choose those policies that will be most advantageous to humans and the environment in which we live.
‘This is a fascinating, eclectic group of professional papers in which the reader may explore both the first principles of Modern Monetary Theory and many institutional and historical details that lend weight to the conceptual framework. This book is a landmark in the development of MMT, a boon for “useful” economists — and a profound challenge to all the others.’
– James K. Galbraith, The University of Texas at Austin, US
‘This book brings together insights from MMT scholars from all over the world, examining the economy of the UK as well as the global economy and providing us with much needed insights about how to manage our economies.’
– Dirk Ehnts, Fachhochschule Magedburrg-Stendal, Germany
Official Edward Elgar webpage:
I want this book.
Could you make the book available for purchase as a DRM-free download?
Regarding the presentation on you tube from the launch and the Q&A session and Labour’s investment bank.
It is just deficit spending 101.
Scott Fullwiler did a paper on it in 2015 with the actual accounting.
https://neweconomicperspectives.org/2015/09/corbynomics-101-its-the-deficit-stupid.html
They set an investment bank up in Scotland and it has been a total mess and people who have been running it has resigned. It was being used for all the wrong reasons and actually being used by the private sector to be able to extract more rent. Not accountable or transparent.
All that will happen is instead of having the political fight over deficit spending. That fight will be moved onto the investment bank and the private sector will end up running it. The poachers will become gatekeepers exactly like What happened in Scotland.
The Scottish national investment bank
https://robinmcalpine.org/a-little-map-of-whats-wrong/
Might be worth doing a GIMMS version of Scott Fullwiler’s article in New economic perspectives called – Corbynomics 101—It’s the Deficit, Stupid!
https://neweconomicperspectives.org/2015/09/corbynomics-101-its-the-deficit-stupid.html
Including the accounting to front run Labour’s idea of a national investment bank?